ABSTRACT:

This article examines the evolving nexus between transnational terrorism and local conflicts in Africa, proposing an interpretive new paradigm for understanding their mutual reinforcement. The objective is to clarify how global jihadist and other transnational networks embed themselves within localized grievances, and to assess the implications for conflict dynamics and policy responses in a new interpretive paradigm. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative comparative case study approach, drawing on secondary data, policy documents, and academic literature covering the Sahel, the Lake Chad Basin, the Horn of Africa, and parts of the Great Lakes region. The analysis traces patterns of recruitment, resource flows, ideological diffusion, and tactical adaptation, focusing on how transnational actors instrumentalize ethnic tensions, governance vacuums, and economic marginalization. Using process tracing and cross case comparison, the article identifies recurrent mechanisms such as the localization of global narratives, the hybridization of insurgent structures, and the criminalization of conflict economies. Results indicate that transnational groups do not simply “penetrate” local conflicts but rather, they co produce new conflict orders in partnership with local elites, militias, and community networks. This co-production blurs the lines between political violence, organized crime, and communal strife, complicating conventional counterterrorism and peace building strategies. The study concludes that security responses focused narrowly on military containment or decapitations of leadership are inadequate. A more integrated interpretive paradigm addressing governance deficits, localized grievances, and regional economic interdependencies is essential for disrupting the mutually constitutive relationship between transnational terrorism and local conflicts in Africa.

Keywords: Transnational, Terrorism, ideology, case study, integrated